Butera Law
610-265-0800

2010

2009

2008

Winter

There Is No Need To Whine If They Don’t Carry The Wine

A New Mortgage Lender Law (Oh Yes, There Will be a Day!)

Protection for Cash Deposits

Low Interest Loans, No Interest Loans, Taxes and Other Consequences

Criminal Expungement Becoming Easier

The Queen's English - A Strange Word and Stranger Yet Movie

Fall

Negotiating Tips for Stressful Times

Acquiring Equipment - The Options

Sale of Business Seminar

Managing the Credit Crunch

Are There Any Safe Investments?

Maintaining a Family Limited Partnership

Home Buyers: Beware of Quirk in Standard Form

Summer/Fall

Jurisdiction in the Internet

A Brief Review of Product Warranties for Sellers and Buyers

Know Your Customers

Rental Losses for Real Estate Professionals

Latin Lovers

A Child Custody Alternative: The Parenting Coordinator

Queen's English - Some Off-Beat Words You May Encounter

Summer

Securing Promises to Pay or Perform

For the Elderly: A Reverse Mortgage?

Executing Against and Garnishing Assets

Five Tips to Avoid Bad Debts

Judgment without a Trial: The risks and rewards of Confession of Judgment

Steps to Insure Against Vendor/Supplier Failures

Spring/Summer

A Fair Bet!

Pennsylvania's Implied Warranty of Habitability

Traffic Stops: Keep Your Cool!

Queen's English

The Vanishing MSRP?

Doppio Espresso - And Don't Hold the Caffeine!

Wait Staff Tips and Minimum Wage Laws

Spring

Avoiding Conflicts Between Tenant and Landlord's Bank

A Second Look at Title Insurance

Auto Insurance Tips

Estate Tax Reform?

Federal Removal

Tax Changes for 2008

Terminating Parental Rights

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

  Federal Removal

     Early in our history there was fierce independence on the part of the individual states making up our republic.  On the one hand, the states were sovereign governments; on the other, they were each players in a larger national government.

   The federal court system was developed initially to deal with disputes between state governments and between citizens of different states (to avoid any "home field advantage") as well as dealing with cases involving the application of purely federal law.   Today's federal courts typically hear cases involving interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, and disputes between citizens of different states were the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

   The federal removal statute (28 U.S.C. §1441) exists to allow a defendant sued in a state court to "remove" that case to federal court if it could have been brought in federal court initially.  The original purpose of the removal statute was to give non-local defendants the right to move the case to federal court based upon the belief that the federal courts, operating under the same rules regardless of geographic location, would provide a more neutral forum as compared to a "local" state court.

     It could be argued that the removal statute has outlived its purpose in the 21st century in light of the homogenization of our society as a result of improved communication and the availability of information in the media and over the internet. Some have argued that the reasons for creation of the removal statute are no longer valid, but try telling that a New York driver who is sued for personal injuries in a local South Georgia courthouse (or, in fairness, a driver from rural Georgia sued in New York City.) Maybe removal to federal court aint such a bad idea. . .
 
- Kevin Palmer

 

 

Home / Attorneys / Practice Area / Newsletters / Contact Us