2010
2009
2008
Winter
There Is No Need To Whine If They Don’t Carry The Wine
A New Mortgage Lender Law (Oh Yes, There Will be a Day!)
Protection for Cash Deposits
Low Interest Loans, No Interest Loans, Taxes and Other Consequences
Criminal Expungement Becoming Easier
The Queen's English - A Strange Word and Stranger Yet Movie
Fall
Negotiating Tips for Stressful Times
Acquiring Equipment - The Options
Sale of Business Seminar
Managing the Credit Crunch
Are There Any Safe Investments?
Maintaining a Family Limited Partnership
Home Buyers: Beware of Quirk in Standard Form
Summer/Fall
Jurisdiction in the Internet
A Brief Review of Product Warranties for Sellers and Buyers
Know Your Customers
Rental Losses for Real Estate Professionals
Latin Lovers
A Child Custody Alternative: The Parenting Coordinator
Queen's English - Some Off-Beat Words You May Encounter
Summer
Securing Promises to Pay or Perform
For the Elderly: A Reverse Mortgage?
Executing Against and Garnishing Assets
Five Tips to Avoid Bad Debts
Judgment without a Trial: The risks and rewards of Confession of Judgment
Steps to Insure Against Vendor/Supplier Failures
Spring/Summer
A Fair Bet!
Pennsylvania's Implied Warranty of Habitability
Traffic Stops: Keep Your Cool!
Queen's English
The Vanishing MSRP?
Doppio Espresso - And Don't Hold the Caffeine!
Wait Staff Tips and Minimum Wage Laws
Spring
Avoiding Conflicts Between Tenant and Landlord's Bank
A Second Look at Title Insurance
Auto Insurance Tips
Estate Tax Reform?
Federal Removal
Tax Changes for 2008
Terminating Parental Rights
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
|
Federal Removal
Early in our history there was fierce independence on the part of the individual states making up our republic. On the one hand, the states were sovereign governments; on the other, they were each players in a larger national government.
The federal court system was developed initially to deal with disputes between state governments and between citizens of different states (to avoid any "home field advantage") as well as dealing with cases involving the application of purely federal law. Today's federal courts typically hear cases involving interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, and disputes between citizens of different states were the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
The federal removal statute (28 U.S.C. §1441) exists to allow a defendant sued in a state court to "remove" that case to federal court if it could have been brought in federal court initially. The original purpose of the removal statute was to give non-local defendants the right to move the case to federal court based upon the belief that the federal courts, operating under the same rules regardless of geographic location, would provide a more neutral forum as compared to a "local" state court.
It could be argued that the removal statute has outlived its purpose in the 21st century in light of the homogenization of our society as a result of improved communication and the availability of information in the media and over the internet. Some have argued that the reasons for creation of the removal statute are no longer valid, but try telling that a New York driver who is sued for personal injuries in a local South Georgia courthouse (or, in fairness, a driver from rural Georgia sued in New York City.) Maybe removal to federal court aint such a bad idea. . .
- Kevin Palmer
|