2010
2009
2008
Winter
There Is No Need To Whine If They Don’t Carry The Wine
A New Mortgage Lender Law (Oh Yes, There Will be a Day!)
Protection for Cash Deposits
Low Interest Loans, No Interest Loans, Taxes and Other Consequences
Criminal Expungement Becoming Easier
The Queen's English - A Strange Word and Stranger Yet Movie
Fall
Negotiating Tips for Stressful Times
Acquiring Equipment - The Options
Sale of Business Seminar
Managing the Credit Crunch
Are There Any Safe Investments?
Maintaining a Family Limited Partnership
Home Buyers: Beware of Quirk in Standard Form
Summer/Fall
Jurisdiction in the Internet
A Brief Review of Product Warranties for Sellers and Buyers
Know Your Customers
Rental Losses for Real Estate Professionals
Latin Lovers
A Child Custody Alternative: The Parenting Coordinator
Queen's English - Some Off-Beat Words You May Encounter
Summer
Securing Promises to Pay or Perform
For the Elderly: A Reverse Mortgage?
Executing Against and Garnishing Assets
Five Tips to Avoid Bad Debts
Judgment without a Trial: The risks and rewards of Confession of Judgment
Steps to Insure Against Vendor/Supplier Failures
Spring/Summer
A Fair Bet!
Pennsylvania's Implied Warranty of Habitability
Traffic Stops: Keep Your Cool!
Queen's English
The Vanishing MSRP?
Doppio Espresso - And Don't Hold the Caffeine!
Wait Staff Tips and Minimum Wage Laws
Spring
Avoiding Conflicts Between Tenant and Landlord's Bank
A Second Look at Title Insurance
Auto Insurance Tips
Estate Tax Reform?
Federal Removal
Tax Changes for 2008
Terminating Parental Rights
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
|
Doppio Espresso - And Don't Hold the Caffeine!
Starbucks has reason to choke on its latte after a California Court awarded $100,000,000 to its baristas as a result of an improper tip-pooling arrangement. (A barista is one of those people in Starbucks cafes who make up your drinks. They are apparently hourly employees in most cases.)
Since the year 2000, Starbucks has employed as many as 120,000 baristas in California alone. The policy at these cafes has been to divide tips among the hourly employees (the baristas) and the supervisors, who are paid flat salaries. The total tips received by the supervisors since 2000 was $84,000,000, and with interest the amount exceeds $100,000,000.
The Court's ruling was based on a statute which provides that tips left for hourly employees may not be "taken" by employers or "agents"; the Court deemed supervisors to be agents of the employer. That Starbucks has appealed the decision and vigorously challenges the Court's finding should surprise no one; California may be the largest state, but it's only one of 50, and similar lawsuits are being filed across the Country.
If Starbucks fails to have the ruling reversed, and if other states have similar statutes protecting hourly employees, the cost to Starbucks could be staggering.
Starbucks' stock has dropped by 50% in value over the past 48 months. This ruling can only exacerbate its problems. On the other hand America's thirst for coffee-based drinks seems incapable of being slaked, and it is likely that Starbucks will survive (with or without grumpy supervisors!).
-- Ken Butera
|